It’s been a while since I last had a job description, I remember it because I had just started doing the job in question and very quickly it evolved into something quite different. Part of that was the evolving nature of the job and part was my own doing as I quickly found a number of things that needed to be done. A good chunk of this was HR stuff but there was also a lot that wasn’t and ranged from commercial, to sales and even account management – so there was no shortage of learning!
At roughly the same time I was asked along with my colleague Helen Durkin to present to our Group Exec board about the future generation and how technology might influence the workplace. This was later built into our 5 year strategy and defines a lot of what we are working on right now. As a result of this presentation we came in contact with a lot of external research and opinions which helped us develop our thinking on this.
Since then we’ve been busy building this thinking into our future plans – in fact Helen has done a huge amount of work with our Employer Brand (which also won 2 awards recently) and has really switched on how we engage with potential candidates through content on our careers hub (www.careersatcarphone.com) and social media.
Fast forward to today and I’m reading a book called ‘The Alliance’ by LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman (which I highly recommend reading) that talks about the concept of ‘Tours of Duty’ to help develop an individual and indeed placing this approach above a formal job description. Something that LinkedIn fully embraces and something that the beloved Gen Y’ers find very appealing.
Gone are the traditional ‘job for life’ careers in favour of a generation of career mobile individuals who place less importance on financial reward for their effort and instead seek out new and exciting opportunities to learn and grow. An approach that can take a variety of forms such as growing breadth in an organisation by experiencing lots of different roles, or by moving between organisations and cultures. Even spending some time working in a different country by experiencing their culture socially as well as professionally. There are many different views of what the future of the workplace will look like but the common thread is that it will be fundamentally different and we need to change our approach.
This brings me back to my opening sentence, having just agreed to take on a different role and one that doesn’t have a job description but was explained to me over a coffee that focussed on my career and what I’m looking for and lacking at the moment. What excited me about the opportunity was three things;
- Firstly the approach my new boss took in explaining the role to me (we have known each other for quite some time now which probably helps) – but she spent the time talking about her experiences, what I wanted and how working together could benefit both of our careers and all in a style that was more akin to a couple of good friends talking over a coffee than a work situation. The approach she took is exactly the same as the one described in ‘The Alliance’ and definitely motivated me to consider the opportunity.
- Secondly the only thing we talked about in term of detail of the role were some very big aspirational goals that will take 18 – 24 months before we see the outputs from them, and hey it’ll be really tough to deliver them but will also be a lot of fun.
- Thirdly, and possibly the most important one for me personally – the team behind this (4 of us) are very like minded, passionate about adding value and already know and get on well with each other (Helen is one of these people).
So here I am about to commit a good chunk of time to a project that hasn’t been defined in great detail and will require a lot of effort and time to deliver based on a conversation that lasted 2hrs. I don’t have a job description and I don’t expect (or need) one.
I was thinking about my decision this morning whilst I was with our HRBP team and Ian Milton from Towers Watson to talk about how to grade a new or existing role in an organisation and how to construct a “good job description” which is the basis not only of benchmarking a role but a whole host of other stuff such as a PDR conversation, performance management, the decision to restructure a business.
So is getting rid of the JD something that could happen? Well in reality there are probably a lot of people reading this who would say yes, and it’s already happened for them. Interim employees (by a large number) already work this way, exec directors have a service agreement and often not a job description so it is possible, but is it possible to do this for the wholesale majority? Is it possible to have a workforce that think of their relationship with an organisation as an alliance. An alliance that mutually benefits both parties and is built on an honest and open relationship that doesn’t need a 2 page document to attract, engage and manage an employee, doesn’t need a formal 6 monthly appraisal meeting to review against the job description and allows people to grow by delivering against an agreed tour of duty?
Given that I’m experiencing this already and that the last couple of conversations I’ve had about roles both in and out of my current organisation have not included a job description, I’m convinced it is possible, are you?